According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Bitcoin ETFs on March 25, 2025, was US$ 26.8 million. Notably, the IBIT ETF saw an inflow of US$ 42 million, indicating strong investor interest. In contrast, BITB and BTCW ETFs experienced outflows of US$ 10.1 million and US$ 5.1 million, respectively, suggesting a shift in investor sentiment. This data is crucial for traders assessing the current market dynamics and ETF performance. Full details are available at farside.co.uk/btc.

According to Farside Investors, Bitcoin ETF flows as of March 24, 2025, indicate a total net inflow of $84.2 million. Notably, FBTC experienced a significant inflow of $82.9 million, while ARKB saw an outflow of $41 million. These movements suggest a mixed investor sentiment, with substantial interest in certain ETFs like FBTC and BITB ($19.2 million inflow) but a notable withdrawal from ARKB. Such data is crucial for traders assessing current market dynamics and potential investment opportunities within Bitcoin ETFs. (Source: Farside Investors)

According to Farside Investors, the Ethereum ETF market showed no net flow across all tracked ETFs on March 24, 2025. This includes popular ETFs such as ETHA, FETH, and ETHE, indicating a period of stagnation in Ethereum ETF trading activity. This data suggests a neutral stance in market sentiment regarding Ethereum ETFs on this particular date.

According to Lookonchain, Bitcoin ETFs experienced a positive net flow of 1,497 BTC, equivalent to $131.72 million, with iShares (Blackrock) contributing significantly by adding 1,250 BTC ($110 million). iShares now holds a total of 573,878 BTC valued at $50.48 billion. Conversely, Ethereum ETFs saw a negative net flow of 5,852 ETH, amounting to a $12.15 million decrease, with iShares (Blackrock) responsible for outflows of 6,055 ETH valued at $12.57 million.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Bitcoin ETFs on March 21, 2025, was US$ 83.1 million, primarily driven by an inflow of US$ 105 million into the IBIT ETF, while the GBTC ETF experienced a significant outflow of US$ 21.9 million. This shift suggests a strong investor interest in IBIT as opposed to GBTC, potentially impacting trading strategies in the Bitcoin ETF market.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Bitcoin ETFs on March 20, 2025, was positive at $165.7 million. Notably, the IBIT ETF saw a significant inflow of $172.1 million, indicating strong investor interest. Conversely, BITB experienced an outflow of $17.4 million, and GBTC saw a reduction of $8 million, reflecting potential profit-taking or reallocation. Meanwhile, the HODL ETF received $11.9 million, suggesting continued confidence in long-term Bitcoin holding strategies.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Bitcoin ETFs on March 19, 2025, was $11.8 million. Notably, BITB led with a $12.1 million inflow, while BTCO experienced a significant outflow of $10.2 million. GBTC and BTC also saw inflows of $5.4 million and $4.5 million, respectively. This data suggests a mixed sentiment among investors towards Bitcoin ETFs, with specific funds attracting more capital than others.

According to Farside Investors, the Ethereum ETF market experienced a net outflow of $11.7 million on March 19, 2025, with significant withdrawals from ETHA and FETH amounting to $12.9 million and $2 million, respectively. Notably, ETHE saw an inflow of $10.2 million, contrasting with the overall negative trend. This data indicates potential bearish sentiment among investors towards certain Ethereum ETFs, while ETHE's inflow suggests possible confidence in its performance.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow into Bitcoin ETFs on March 18, 2025, was US$209.1 million, with IBIT leading at US$218.1 million. ARKB experienced a net outflow of US$9 million, while other ETFs showed no flow. This data suggests a strong investor interest in IBIT, potentially indicating a bullish sentiment towards Bitcoin through this ETF.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on 2025-03-18 was -$52.8 million, with ETHA leading the outflows at -$40.2 million, followed by FETH at -$3.3 million, and ETH at -$9.3 million. Other ETFs like ETHW, CETH, ETHV, QETH, EZET, and ETHE showed no flow. This data suggests a significant withdrawal from Ethereum ETFs, particularly ETHA, indicating a potential shift in investor sentiment towards Ethereum-based investment products.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow into Bitcoin ETFs on 2025-03-17 was US$274.6 million. The largest contributors were FBTC with US$127.3 million, ARKB with US$88.5 million, and IBIT with US$42.3 million. BITB and BTC also saw inflows of US$2.3 million and US$14.2 million, respectively. Other ETFs like BTCO, EZBC, BRRR, HODL, BTCW, and GBTC reported no inflows. This data suggests a continued interest in Bitcoin investment vehicles, with FBTC leading the pack.

According to Farside Investors, the Ethereum ETF Flow for 2025-03-17 showed a total net outflow of US$7.3 million, primarily due to a -7.3 outflow from ETHE, with no flows reported for other Ethereum-related ETFs such as ETHA, FETH, ETHW, CETH, ETHV, QETH, EZET, and ETH.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Bitcoin ETFs on March 12, 2025, was US$13.3 million. Notably, ARKB saw a significant inflow of US$82.6 million, while IBIT experienced a substantial outflow of US$47.1 million. Other ETFs like BTCO and GBTC also saw outflows of US$12.4 million and US$11.8 million, respectively. BTC, however, had a minor inflow of US$5.5 million. This data suggests a mixed sentiment among investors, with a slight overall positive flow towards Bitcoin ETFs.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on 2025-03-12 was -10.3 million USD, indicating a net outflow. Significant outflows were observed in FETH (-3.7 million USD), CETH (-1.7 million USD), EZET (-1.4 million USD), and ETH (-3.5 million USD), while ETHA, ETHW, ETHV, QETH, and ETHE showed no change in flow.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow of Bitcoin ETFs on March 11, 2025, was -371 million USD, indicating significant outflows across various ETFs. Notably, IBIT and FBTC experienced the largest outflows of -151.3 million USD and -107.1 million USD, respectively. This data suggests a potential shift in investor sentiment towards Bitcoin ETFs.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on 2025-03-11 was -21.6 million USD, with ETHA and FETH experiencing outflows of -11.8 million USD and -9.8 million USD respectively. Other Ethereum-related ETFs, including ETHW, CETH, ETHV, QETH, EZET, ETHE, and ETH, showed no net flow. This data suggests a bearish sentiment among investors towards Ethereum ETFs on this date.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on 2025-03-10 was -34 million USD, indicating a significant outflow. The largest outflows were observed in FETH (-23.7 million USD), ETHE (-4.8 million USD), and ETH (-3.9 million USD), with ETHW also showing a minor outflow of -1.6 million USD. Other ETFs like ETHA, ETHV, QETH, and EZET reported no flow. This data suggests a bearish sentiment among investors towards Ethereum ETFs on this date.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow of Bitcoin ETFs on 2025-03-07 was -409.3 million USD, indicating significant outflows. Major contributors to this trend were FBTC with -154.9 million USD, ARKB with -160 million USD, and IBIT with -39.9 million USD. GBTC also saw outflows of -36.5 million USD, while HODL was the only ETF with a positive flow of 0.6 million USD. This data suggests a bearish sentiment among investors towards Bitcoin ETFs on this date.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on 2025-03-07 was -23.1 million USD, with ETHA and FETH experiencing outflows of -11.2 million USD and -11.9 million USD respectively. Other Ethereum ETFs such as ETHW, CETH, ETHV, QETH, EZET, ETHE, and ETH showed no flow activity.

According to Farside Investors, the total net flow for Ethereum ETFs on 2025-03-06 was -10 million USD, with ETHA contributing the entire outflow. Other ETFs, including FETH, ETHW, CETH, ETHV, QETH, EZET, ETHE, and ETH, showed no net flow. This data suggests a cautious or bearish sentiment among investors towards Ethereum ETFs, specifically ETHA, on this date.