According to Lookonchain, two new wallets, likely associated with hackers, received 14,064 ETH from THORChain and Chainflip. These funds were then exchanged for 27.5 million DAI at an average selling price of $1,956 per ETH. This significant liquidation could impact ETH's market price as large sell-offs typically increase supply, potentially leading to price volatility.

According to Lookonchain, two new wallets, likely linked to hackers, received 14,064 ETH from THORChain and Chainflip. These wallets subsequently exchanged the ETH for $27.5 million DAI at an average price of $1,956 per ETH. This activity may influence market sentiment as large sell-offs can trigger price volatility.

According to EmberCN, over the past 24 hours, Bybit hackers have converted 71,000 ETH, valued at $170 million, into assets on other blockchains. Since February 22, the hackers have continuously moved ETH, converting a total of 206,000 ETH out of the initial 499,000 ETH stolen. On average, 45,000 ETH have been moved daily. The hackers' addresses still hold 292,000 ETH, valued at $685 million.

According to @EmberCN, Bybit hackers have laundered 45,900 ETH, equivalent to $1.13 billion, in the past 24 hours. The hackers have so far laundered a total of 135,000 ETH ($3.35 billion), which is nearly one-third of the total stolen amount. Currently, the hackers still hold 363,900 ETH ($9 billion) in their address. At the current rate, it will take 8 to 10 days to launder the remaining amount.

According to @EmberCN, Bybit hackers have sold 50,700 ETH worth $142 million, converting them into DAI and other assets like BTC. They still hold 448,600 ETH valued at $1.26 billion. Meanwhile, a Bybit-associated address (0x2E4...b77) is reportedly purchasing ETH through Galaxy Digital, FalconX, and Wintermute.

According to @EmberCN, Bybit hackers have used the Chainflip cross-chain swap tool to convert ETH into assets on other chains. After dispersing 5,000 ETH to multiple addresses 40 minutes ago, they have successfully laundered 205 ETH through Chainflip. Source: etherscan.io/address/0x60e4…

According to @evilcos, a significant TRX theft incident was reported, where several million dollars worth of TRX were stolen by hackers, highlighting security concerns in the Tron network. Despite the incident, no recovery actions were possible, demonstrating the importance of enhanced security measures for traders investing in TRX. This event underscores the necessity for traders to implement robust security protocols when handling TRX and similar cryptocurrencies.

According to Lookonchain, hackers have returned $19.3 million to the US government. This development is significant for the cryptocurrency market as it highlights ongoing security challenges and the potential for recovery of stolen assets. Traders should monitor how this affects market trust and regulatory responses.

According to @EmberCN, they clarified that their previous statements were not in support of hackers. This clarification is crucial for traders to understand the context and avoid misinformation that could affect market sentiment.

According to Lookonchain, three hackers have deposited a total of 17,800 ETH, valued at $42.7 million, into an unspecified platform over the past three days. Specifically, the Penpiexyz exploiter deposited 9,600 ETH ($23 million), and the WazirX exploiter deposited 7,200 ETH ($17.3 million). This significant movement of funds could indicate potential market impacts.

According to @MistTrack_io, hackers have transferred 3700 ETH within a few hours, but their original address still holds over 10,000 ETH. The address in question is 0x58d3b2fd2ce20a7149244d7e34d18b9b55448e7a.

According to @EmberCN, the security measures of Bitget might not be robust enough to deter hackers, implying potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited. This insight suggests that traders should be cautious about the security risks when using the Bitget exchange.

According to @EmberCN, the issue raised by @birdvski regarding Bitget is manageable and poses only a minor challenge for hackers. This suggests that while there may be vulnerabilities, they are not significant enough to cause major concern for traders.